SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1299

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
AISHWARYA DEV CHAND KATOCH – Appellant
Versus
T. M. PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN BHARDWAJ, ARVIND GOEL, Harish Malhotra, Uday Gupta


PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

( 1 ) 1. Defendant's application IA No. 1617/2004 is being disposed of by the present order.

( 2 ) APPLICATION invokes Order 7 Rule 11 (a) praying that the plaint be rejected.

( 3 ) GROUNDS on which rejection of the plaint is sought is that case of the plaintiff is based on a will dated 6. 7. 1999 executed by Late Rajmata kamalendumati Shah. It is stated in the application that the deceased died of brain cancer while staying at Dehradun on 15. 7. 1999. She was aged 97 years. The will relied upon has been executed at a place called Chuwari in Himachal pradesh which is at a distance of 600 kms from Dehradun. Accordingly, it is stated that the will is shrouded in mystery.

( 4 ) MEDICAL record of the deceased is sought to be relied upon to show that on 9. 7. 1999 the deceased was at Dehradun.

( 5 ) SECOND ground taken is that the will has not been probated and therefore cannot be used as a document of title.

( 6 ) THIRD ground for rejection of the plaint is that vide deed of trust dated 31. 9. 1970 the suit properties were vested in a trust and the deceased had completely divested herself from the property. Accordingly, it is stated that the deceased could n




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top