SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1339

High Court Of Delhi
J. M. MALIK
MEENA KUMARI - Appellant
Versus
DELHI COMMISSION FOR WOMEN - Respondents
WP (C) 17699 Of 2004
Decided On : 08/11/2006

Advocates Appeared:
VINOD KUMAR, VIVEK KUMAR TANDON

The main legal point established is that appointments must adhere to relevant rules and be made after proper competition among qualified persons. Temporary employees cannot claim to be made permanent on the expiry of their term of appointment.

Headnote:

Contractual Appointment - Regularization of Services - Constitution Bench Case - [Project workers, Contractual Appointment, Regularization of Services] - The court discussed the implications of the Constitution Bench case on irregular appointments and the necessity for regularization of services. It highlighted the principles that appointments must be in line with relevant rules and after proper competition among qualified persons, and that temporary employees cannot claim to be made permanent on the expiry of their term of appointment.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, appointed on a contractual basis, sought regularization of her services and appropriate pay scale. The respondent issued a memorandum terminating her services, leading to the petitioner filing a writ petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's appointment was irregular and did not qualify for regularization as per the Constitution Bench case. It dismissed the petition as without merit.

Issues: The issues revolved around the irregular appointment of the petitioner, the necessity for regularization, and the implications of the Constitution Bench case on the petitioner's case.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that appointments must be in line with relevant rules and after proper competition among qualified persons. It clarified that temporary employees cannot claim to be made permanent on the expiry of their term of appointment.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed as without merit, with no costs awarded.


J. M. MALIK, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is in service on contractual basis. Her appointment letter dated 28th June, 2002 reads:"i am directed to offer you the contractual appointment as Project workers on a consolidated monthly remuneration of Rs. 4,500/- under terms and conditions enclosed for a period of four (4) months w. e. f. 1st April, 2002 to 31st July, 2002. The Commission, however, reserves the right to terminate the services at any time during contract with notice of 15 days or remuneration in lieu of notice period without assigning any reason thereof. You are requested to sign the terms and conditions of contract as a token of acceptance within three days of receipt of this letter failing which the offer stands terminated without further reference to you. Yours faithfully, sd/- (ALKA SHARMA)Assistant Secretary delhi Commission for Women. "the terms and conditions of the contract are these:"1. The contract period shall commence as mentioned in the offer letter. The appointment will stand terminated after specified period or the completion of the Project, whichever is earlier. 2. This appointment can be terminated by giving 15 days notice or 15 days remuneration in lieu of the notice for such termination of contract and commission shall not be liable for communicating any reason for the same. The appointment shall give mandatory 15 days notice before termination of contract. 3. The incumbent of the post being offered will have to work for the project assigned to him/her and any other work assigned by the Member-Secretary from time to time. 4. The appointee will employ himself/herself efficiently and diligently and will devote his/her whole time to the duties assigned and will not engaged directly or indirectly in any trade or occupation on his/her own account. 5. the contract appointee shall not be entitled to any leave. He/she will be governed by the normal Delhi Govt. 's holiday during the period. However, 10 dyas Casual Leave per year would be permitted to be considered on quarterly basis. 6. At the termination of the appointment, the incumbent shall not be entitled to any terminal benefits. 7. The contract will not entitled the candidate to any right of regular appointment in the Commission or claim for seniority for purpose of employment in the Commission. "

( 2 ) ON 27. 10. 2004, the petitioner received the following memorandum:"since the Finance Department, Government of NCT of Delhi has concurred to your appointment in the Delhi Commission for Women on contract basis only up to March 31, 2004 as per the terms and conditions of your appointment, 15 days' notice of termination of service is hereby given with effect from 3rd November, 2004 this issues with the approval of Member Secretary, DCW. "

( 3 ) IN this writ petition the petitioner has prayed that appropriate writ be issued, the impugned order dated 27. 10. 2004 be quashed, the respondent be directed to consider to regularize the petitioner in the post of Record keeper and the petitioner be put in appropriate pay scale as drawn by the equally placed persons in other Government departments/agencies etc. Vide order of this Court passed on 09. 11. 2004, the respondent was directed not to terminate the services of the petitioner till further orders.

( 4 ) AT the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the latest Constitution Bench case reported in Secretary, State of karnataka versus Uma Devi, 2006 (4) SCC Page 1 rather supports the case of the petitioner. He has drawn my attention towards para 44 of the said judgment, which is reproduced as follows :"44. One aspect needs to be clarified. There may be cases where irregular appointments (not illegal appointments) as explained in S. V. Narayanappa (supra), R. N. Nanjundappa (supra), and B. N. Nagarajan (supra), and referred to in paragraph 15 above, of duly qualified persons in duly sanctioned vacant posts might have been made and the employees have continued to work for ten years or more but




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top