SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1438

S.MURALIDHAR, MUKUL MUDGAL
RAMA SHANKAR – Appellant
Versus
MUKHTIARE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.K.Vashisht, R.Veena, Sarabjit Sharma


S. MURALIDHAR, J.

( 1 ) THESE appeals are directed to against the impugned judgments and orders dated 25th September, 1981 passed by the Additional District Judge, delhi disposing of two references being LAC Nos. 83/1980 and 84/1980 under sections 30/31 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Act' ).

( 2 ) THE facts leading to the filing of the present appeals are that in respect of land admeasuring 93 bighas situated in village Khanpur, which was notified for acquisition for a public purpose by a notification dated 12. 4. 1972 under Section 4 of the Act, an award No. 15/1973-74 came to be made on 26. 6. 1973. The total compensation fixed, including solatium and interest, was Rs. 1,07,439. 43. In respect of a certain portion of the land, the total compensation payable for which was Rs. 16,253. 68, four interested persons namely Shri Rama Shankar and Shri Inder Singh, the appellants herein, and Shri Kishori and Shri Mukhtiare, Respondents No. 1 in each of the appeals filed their claims. The above dispute in relation to apportionment was referred by the Land Acquisition Collector to the learned Additional district Judge in terms of Sections 30/31 of the Act. The cases were registered as















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top