High Court Of Delhi
ANIL KUMAR
AMANPREET SINGH - Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI - Respondents
WP (C) 23032 Of 2005
Decided On : 08/23/2006
certiorari - LLB Examination - Ordinance VII (8) (a), Ordinance VII (9) - The court discussed the promotion rules, attendance requirements, and the power to condone attendance under Ordinance VII. It highlighted the petitioner's eligibility for admission and the lapses on the part of the respondents in denying admission. The court emphasized the need to exclude the period during which admission was not given to the petitioner due to the lapse on the part of the respondents.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a writ to quash the order detaining him from appearing in the third semester LLB examination due to shortage of attendance. The petitioner contended that he was eligible for admission but was denied admission due to lapses on the part of the respondents.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was eligible for admission and that the respondents had denied admission contrary to the rules for promotion. The court also noted the petitioner's adequate performance despite the shortage of attendance.
Issues: The issues revolved around the petitioner's eligibility for admission, the calculation of attendance, and the lapses on the part of the respondents in denying admission.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner's attendance should be counted from the date of admission, and the power to exclude lectures for calculating attendance should have been exercised by the respondents due to their lapse in denying admission.
Final Decision: The court quashed the order detaining the petitioner and directed the respondents to declare the result of the petitioner for the third semester LLB examination.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
( 1 ) THE petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari or any other writ or direction quashing or setting aside the order dated 2nd December, 2005 passed by respondent Nos. 2 detaining the petitioner from appearing in third semester LLB examination on account of shortage of attendance.
( 2 ) BRIEF facts to comprehend the controversies are that petitioner contended that he had been a first class student throughout his life scoring 85% marks in his secondary examination and after graduating the petitioner joined the LLB course at Law Centre I, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, New Delhi. The petitioner qualified all the papers of the first semester. The result of the petitioner for the second semester examination was not declared due to UFM (unfair means) case against him. The petitioner was, therefore, denied admission to second year LLB course which commenced on 2nd August, 2005 and which continued till 9th August, 2005 though he had approached for admission 4th august,2005.
( 3 ) THOUGH the petitioner was eligible for admission to the third semester (2nd Year) as he had already cleared minimum of five papers as per the requirement under the rules, however, he was not given admission and was finally granted admission after his case for unfair means was decided by a communication dated 13th"september, 2005 whereby his examination in one of the papers, Paper vii, was cancelled.
( 4 ) THE petitioner was, however, given admission on 22nd September, 2005 after he had re-applied for admission on 14th September, 2005. On re-applying for admission on 14th September, 2006, he was declined admission on the ground that last date for admission was over though when the petitioner had applied for admission between 2nd August, 2005 to 9th August, 2005 on 4th August,2005, it was represented to the petitioner that he would be given admission once his result for the second semester would be declared. The petitioner had made representation to the Registrar on 15th September, 2005 against not granting him admission in accordance with rules and regulations which was finally granted on 22nd September, 2005. The rules regarding Bachelor of Law (LLB) Degree, according to the petitioner, were stipulated in a Brochure which was given to him prior to his joining the course. The promotion rules stipulated were as follows:"promotion Rules:-A student of the First, Third and Fifth term will be promoted to the second, Fourth and Sixth Term respectively, irrespective of the number of courses in which he/she has failed to pass or failed to appear in the First, third of Fifth Term Examinations: Provided that he or she has not been detained on account of shortage of attendance in First, Third or Fifth Terms examinations, as the case may be. Provided further that no such student shall be admitted to the Third or fifth Term unless he/she has passed in at least five courses offered by him/her for the first and Second Term Examinations taken together in case of promotion from I year to II year and in at least fifteen courses offered by him/her for the first, Second, Third and Fourth Term examinations taken together incase of promotion from II year to III year of the LL. B. course. Note:- The student eligible for admission to III/iv Term must seek admission not later than two weeks from the date (s) of announcements of the results of LL. B. II/iv Term Annual Examinations or within one week of commencement of classes, whichever is later, failing which they will forfeit their right to be admitted to III/v Term. "
( 5 ) THE petitioner attended classes from 22nd September, 2005 and his attendance was 95% as he attended 63 classes out of 65. According to rules of the respondent, a candidate is liable to study at least 66% of the lectures to be entitled for a degree of LLB. The relevant rule regarding attendance is as follows:-"in the case of students studying for the LL. B. Degree examination, no student shall be deemed to have pursued a regular co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.