SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1413

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
RAM SINGH BATRA – Appellant
Versus
SHARAN PREMI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJAY KUMAR, HARJINDER SINGH, R.M.BAGAI


PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

( 1 ) APPLICATION under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC states as under:-"1]. That the plaintiff has filed a suit against the defendant for recovery of Rs. 50,00,000/- only on account of damages. In the said suit he has made scurrilous insinuation, malicious and vexatious allegations which have no iota of truth. 2]. That the matter is sub-judice in the court of MM, New Delhi in which charge sheet for one FCNR account has already been filed which was investigated by the Crime Branch for the offence u/s 420/467/468/471 r/w Section 120-B IPC. 3]. That the plaintiff has not come with clean hands. The suit is false, the defendant has reasonable and probable cause for filing of the FIR because huge amounts have been mis-appropriated by the plaintiff in connivance with others for which the investigation is being carried out by the CBI. 4]. That a written statement to the said case has been filed by the defendant. She relies upon the averments made in the written statement which clearly shows that no cause of action has arisen for filing of the suit. The further investigation is being carried out by the C. B. I as per orders of this hon'ble Court. The offence committed by the pl

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top