SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1691

S.RAVINDRA BHAT
PREM PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
NIRMAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Puneet Taneja


S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.

( 1 ) IN this appeal, under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage, the correctness of an order of the learned Additional District Judge, dated 10-11-2004 on an application moved under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereafter ?the act?) has been challenged.

( 2 ) THE parties to the proceedings, viz the Appellant and the first respondent, were married to each other on 29-5-1985 in accordance with Hindu rites, in Delhi. The appellant was working as a Scientific Officer with the rajasthan Power Station, Rawalbhata, Rajasthan. The second respondent, Ms. Jyotsna, was born to the first respondent during the subsistence of the marriage, on 21-4-1987. The appellant instituted divorce proceedings, on grounds of cruelty and desertion, before the District Judge, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan. The appellant levelled allegations of adultery against the first respondent, and these apparently influenced the District Judge to dismiss an application for maintenance filed by her. Criminal proceedings too were initiated by the first respondent, and ultimately she approached the Supreme Court, for transfer of the divorce proceedings pending in Rajasthan.

( 3 ) THE transfer petition w
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top