SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1718

BADAR DURREZ AHMED
ABDUL SUBHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
E.AHMAD, M.SUFIAN SIDDIQUI, Pawan Sharma, RAKESH BHUGRA

( 1 ) THIS revision petition has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the order dated 7-2-2006 passed by the additional Sessions Judge whereby he confirmed the conviction and sentence awarded by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate under sections 279 and 304-A, I. P. C. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate has passed an order of conviction On 4-9-2005 convicting the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 279, I. P. C. and 304a, i. P. C. By a separate order dated 17-9-2005, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate sentenced the petitioner to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months and also imposed a fine of Rs. 500 in respect of the offence under Section 279, I. P. C. In default of the payment of the fine amount the petitioner was required to undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days. Insofar as the offence under Section 304a, I. P. C. was concerned, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate sentenced the petitioner to rigorous imprisonment for one year and also imposed a fine of Rs. 2500. In default of the payment of fine, the petitioner was required to undergo simple imprisonment for two months. Both the sentences of imprisonment were directed to run concurrently




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top