SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1708

MUKUL MUDGAL, S.MURALIDHAR
K. K. JINDAL – Appellant
Versus
LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR (N-W) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SANJAY PODDAR, SUMIT BANSAL


S. MURALIDHAR, J.

( 1 ) ON 15. 1. 2004, a notification was issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ("act") notifying the land ad-measuring 4 bighas and 4 biswas in Village Saleempur majra, Madipur, Delhi, of which the petitioner was 50% owner, for the public purpose of a primary school. On 5. 3. 2004, a declaration under Section 6 of the Act was issued and, simultaneously, a separate-jiotification was issued under Section 17 (1) of the Act directing the Land Acquisition Collector (North-West) ('lac') to take possession of the land. Thereafter notices under Section 9 and 10 of the Act were issued.

( 2 ) THE petitioner filed a response to the said notices under Sections 9 and 10, claiming compensation for the land at Rs. 84,000/- per sq. m. , along with other statutory benefits. On 19. 4. 2004, the petitioner was issued a cheque in the sum of Rs. 67,99,561 towards the 80 per cent compensation of the land as required under Section 17 (3a) of the Act. The rate at which this amount was calculated was Rs. 3696/- per sq. m. However, this was done prior to the making of the Award, and on an approximation of the compensation payable.

( 3 ) ON 3. 3. 2006, the LAC issued a











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top