SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1785

HIMA KOHLI, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
AJAY SAXENA – Appellant
Versus
RACHNA SAXENA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JHUM, JHUM JHUM SARKAR, P.K.SRIVASTAV


HIMA KOHLI, J.

( 1 ) THE present appeal arises out of the order dated 11th August, 2005 passed by the learned single Judge on an application bearing IA No. 1023/2003, whereby the respondent/plaintiff who is the wife of the appellant/defendant prayed for directions to the appellant/defendant to reimburse the respondent/plaintiff for the expenses incurred by her on account of her treatment for Tuberculosis of the Spine amounting to Rs. 66,642/- up to 3rd January, 2003. By way of the impugned order, the learned single Judge observed that the respondent had failed to file any reply to the application in question which was pending for almost two and a half years. It was also observed that various receipts had been filed by the respondent showing that she was suffering from Tuberculosis of Spine and was undergoing treatment for the same which was still continuing. On the basis of the consolidated details of expenses filed by the respondent and annexed to the aforesaid application moved by her, the learned single Judge directed the appellant to reimburse the respondent, the expenses to the extent of Rs. 66,542/- within a period of eight weeks from the date of the said order.

( 2 ) AGGRI























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top