SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1782

ANIL KUMAR
PREM G"S INTERNATIONAL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.L.RAVAL, KULJIT RAVAL


ANIL KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has prayed for issuance of Writ of mandamus, certiorari or any other writ or order quashing the impugned order dated 11. 10. 1993 passed by the Textile Commissioner, Bombay and issuing directions for the release of forfeited 40% amount of Bank Guarantee equivalent to Rs. 1,25,039/- furnished by bank guarantee by the petitioner with respondent no. 2, AEPC, Delhi.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts to comprehend the controversies are that petitioner contended that it is a export company and is engaged in the business of exporting readymade garments and other items to the foreign countries having its registered office at A-4, Nizammudin West, New Delhi and factory at A-18, sector vi, Noida Complex, District Gaziabad, U. P.

( 3 ) RESPONDENT no. 2, AEPC, is an Undertaking of Ministry of Textiles and regulates the export of garments especially Knitwear from India to foreign countries.

( 4 ) IT is the case of the Petitioner that the Ministry of Textiles through its Joint Secretary issued a notification bearing no. 1/4/90-EP (Tandj)I (Apparels) dated 31. 8. 1990 laying down the guidelines under OGL-3 for export of garments and Knitwear from India for the calendar yea
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top