SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1852

SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
SAIN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
HARCOURT BUTLER SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
APARNA BHARDVAJ, K.S.PARIHAR, RAJESH TYAGI

( 1 ) BY this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the notices dated 9/10/1998 issued by the respondent school to the petitioners under section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act informing the petitioners that in view of the order of Supreme Court in pollution matters Government had issued notification banning plying of more than 20 yeas old buses w. e. f. 1st October, 1998. Since the buses used by the school were more than 20 yeas old, the school was keeping these buses off the road and school did not intend to ply buses anymore. In these circumstances, the services of petitioners would stand terminated w. e. f. 10th November, 1998. Each petitioner was sent a cheque of the amount of retrenchment compensation in terms of clause 25 F of Industrial disputes Act. Since the petitioners were in occupation of the residential accommodation provided by the school, they were told to vacate the residential quarters and were also told that in case they continued to keep these quarters after 10th November, 1998, they will be charged mesne profits and damages at the rate of Rs. 5,000. 00 p. m.

( 2 ) AT the admission stage, the petitioners alleged that they were governed by Delhi Sch







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top