SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 2267

GITA MITTAL
ALANKAR GLOBAL PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
DINESH KUMAR MATHUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amjad Hussain, R.K.JAIN, SANDEEP SHARMA


GITA MITTAL, J.

( 1 ) BY this judgment, I propose to decide this application filed by the defendants under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking a direction that the disputes which are the subject matter of the present suit, be referred to arbitration.

( 2 ) THE applicant places reliance on Clause 23 of an agreement dated 30th March, 2001 which was entered into between Dinesh Kumar Mathur, subhash Rohilla, Meera Mathur and Usha Rani Rohilla. Based thereon, the defendants/applicants have contended that the present suit cannot be proceeded with in the light of Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the disputes have to be referred to arbitration.

( 3 ) FOR the purposes of adjudication of the present application, a distinction has to be borne in mind with regard to the suit claim and the subject matter of the arbitration agreement. In order to appreciate this distinction, it would be necessary to examine a few essential facts. It appears that M/s Alankar Ware Corporation, a partnership firm was established in the year 1973 between Shri Suraj Bhan Rohilla, son of Shri Saran, and Shri subhash Rohilla son of Shri Suraj Bhan Rohilla. It ap






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top