High Court Of Delhi
SWATANTER KUMAR, G. S. SISTANI
COLONEL B.S.RAI - Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA - Respondents
WP (C) 21085 Of 2005
Decided On : 11/16/2006
Army Act - Charge under Section 57 (c) - Summary of Acts and Sections: Army Act Sec 57 (c) - Summary: The court examined the charge under Section 57 (c) of the Army Act, 1950, which involved knowingly and with intent to injure altering a document. The court discussed the evidence, handwriting expert opinion, and the petitioner's defense. The court emphasized the limitations of its jurisdiction in re-appreciating evidence and highlighted the settled legal position in such cases.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Colonel in the Indian Army, was charged under Section 57 (c) of the Army Act for altering a document. After being found guilty by a General Court Martial, the petitioner filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order of sentence. The petitioner primarily argued on the merits and reliability of the evidence recorded before the GCM.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the evidence supported the charge against the petitioner and emphasized the limitations of its jurisdiction in re-appreciating evidence. The court also noted that the punishment imposed on the petitioner may be disproportionate and directed the respondents to reconsider the matter in relation to the imposition of punishment.
Issues: The issues involved the petitioner's challenge to the charge under Section 57 (c) of the Army Act, the reliability of the evidence, and the proportionality of the punishment imposed.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the limited scope of its jurisdiction in re-appreciating evidence and highlighted the settled legal position in such cases. The court also considered the petitioner's service profile and directed the respondents to reconsider the imposition of punishment.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition to the extent of directing the respondents to reconsider the imposition of punishment upon the petitioner and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.
SWATANTER KUMAR, J.
( 1 ) THE petitioner Col. B. S. Rai was charged of having committed the following offence under Section 57 (c) of the Army Act, 1950 on 14. 1. 2004:-"charge SHEET the accused, IC-34740f Colonel Brijendra Singh Rai of Army Headquarters (Directorate General of Signal Intelligence) attached to Headquarters 11 Corps artillery Brigade, an officer holding a permanent commission in the Regular army, is charged with:-Army Act Sec 57 (c) KNOWINGLY AND WITH INTENT TO INJURE ANY PERSON altering A DOCUMENT WHICH IT WAS HIS DUTY TO PRODUCE in that he, at Jalandhar Cantt, on or about 26 Sept 2000, which came to the knowledge of the authority competent to initiate action on 20 Feb 2003, while Commanding 571 Sub group and having awarded figurative assessment of nine points in paragraphs 9 (a), 9 (b), 9 (d), 9 (g), 9 (h), 9 (j), 9 (k), 10 (a) to 10 (g) and 12 of the Annual confidential Report of IC-47755h Major Ajay Shreedhar of his unit, which it was his duty to submit, knowingly altered the assessment to eight points without the knowledge of the said officer. Place: Jalandhar Cantt sd/-Dated : 14 January 2004 (Rajan Anand)Brigadier commander 11 Corps Artillery Brigade to be tried by a General Court Martial sd/-Station : Jalandhar Cantt (Srinivasa Pattabhiraman)Date: January 2004 Lieutenant General general Officer Commanding 11 Corps
( 2 ) WHEREAFTER the petitioner was tried by a General Court Martial which found the petitioner guilty of the charge and sentenced him to take rank and precedence as if his appointment as substantive Colonel bore date the ninth day of March 2004 and to be severely reprimanded. Against the order of sentence, the petitioner submitted a post confirmation petition under Section 164 (2) of the Act to the Secretary, Ministry of Defence raising various issues of law upon merits of the case. This post confirmation petition was rejected vide order dated 28th April, 2005 passed by the Under Secretary to the Government of India, ministry of Defence being devoid of merit and substance. Being aggrieved from the said order, the petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The counsel for the petitioner has primarily argued on the merits, reliability and worthiness of the evidence recorded before the GCM while contending that there is hardly any evidence to support the charge and even the handwriting expert and other witnesses have stated in their evidence, factors which tilt the entire equities in favour of the petitioner. He vehemently contended that the charge itself is unfounded inasmuch as it is impossible in Indian Army, by all standards, that an officer would get 9/9 in all 23 columns of his ACR particularly when the pen picture of the Officer was not admittedly tampered and the pen picture did not reflect any such distinguishing features of Major Ajay Shreedhar that would justify grant of so many nines in his CR. This is also argued that keeping in view the service profile of the said Officer, 23 nines in the CR would patently be a mis-match not only to the pen picture stated in the records but would also be inconsistent with the previous and even records subsequent to the alleged date of occurrence. The proceedings, findings and sentence imposed upon the petitioner are liable to be set aside. In order to examine the merit of these contentions, it may be necessary for us to refer to certain basic facts giving rise to the present petition.
( 3 ) THE petitioner was commissioned in the Indian Army in the Corps of signals on 11th June, 1977 being a high profile officer with an adequate technical expertise and was granted all the promotions including selection grade of Lt. Col. and promotion to the post of Colonel. He was posted to sensitive areas including 571 Sub Group as a Commanding Officer. On 7th September, 2000, father of the petitioner died in a village at Khiragarh in District Rajnandgaon in Madhya Pradesh and while lifting the dead body and the hot
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.