SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 2160

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
NORMA (INDIA) LTD – Appellant
Versus
SAMEER KHANDELWAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pooja Sehgal, Umesh Kumar, VIBHU BHAKRU


PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

( 1 ) BY and under the present order I dispose of IA No. 8363/2006 filed by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC praying that pending disposal of the suit, defendants No. 1 to 3 be restrained from carrying on competing business with that of the plaintiff; defendants No. 4 and 5 be restrained from carrying on competing business with that of the plaintiff; defendants No. 1 to 3 be restrained from dealing with the customers of the plaintiff; defendants No. 1 to 3 be restrained from transferring, alienating or creating third party rights in the movable and immovable assets of defendants No. 4 and 5.

( 2 ) VIDE order dated 31. 7. 2006 while issuing notice in the application, defendants No. 1 to 3 were restrained from transferring, alienating, or creating third party rights in the movable and immovable properties of defendants No. 4 and 5.

( 3 ) SINCE I am dealing with an interim injunction, I would be briefly noting the rival versions. Needless to state, observations and findings in the present order would be for purposes of forming a prima facie opinion. Nothing stated in this order would be read as an expression on the merits of the controversy betwee
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top