SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 2129

A.K.SIKRI
ANIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN SINHA, SANDEEP SHARMA, U.L.WATWANI


A. K. SIKRI, J.

( 1 ) M/s. PREM Nath Autos Pvt. Ltd. , (hereinafter referred to as `the complainant") respondent no. 2 herein has filed complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act against two persons, namely, M/s. Om Sons Autos as accused No. 1 and Shri Anil Kumar, Proprietor of M/s. Om Sons Autos impleading him as Accused No. 2. It is, inter alia, stated that complainant had supplied material to accused persons from time to time and discharged of their liabilities. Accused persons had issued different cheques on different dates for total sum of Rs. 17,76,470/ -. These cheques which were 37 in numbers and particulars whereof are given in para-5 of the complaint were dishonoured on presentation. Legal notice dated 17. 5. 1997 was issued calling upon accused persons to make payment of the amount within 15 days from the date of the receipt of the said notice which was neither replied nor payment was made and, therefore, complaint was filed by the complainant. Vishnu Sharma, authorized representative of the complainant tendered his evidence by way of defence and was examined who exhibited various documents in his examination on the basis of which summoning orders were





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top