SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 2576

HIMA KOHLI
INDRAPRASTHA POWER GENERATION CO. – Appellant
Versus
ISHWARI DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.K.CHAUDHARY, VINAY SABHARWAL

( 1 ) THE petitioner management has filed the present writ petition being aggrieved by an order dated 19th January, 2005 passed by the Labour Court on an application filed by the respondent workman under Section 33-C (2)of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' ).

( 2 ) THE facts leading to the filing of the aforesaid application by the respondent workman are that on 11th August, 1973, an agreement of Wage revision was entered into by the petitioner management with its workers' union. However, certain points of dispute were referred for decision to the sole Arbitrator, Sh. G. Venkata Swamy on 18th October, 1973. The arbitrator gave an interim award on 24th October, 1973 which was implemented by the petitioner management. The arbitrator gave his final award on 21st march, 1977 but the same was not implemented by the petitioner management. As a result, the workers' union raised a dispute which was referred to the Industrial Tribunal by the appropriate authority vide order dated 17th February, 1978. The Industrial Tribunal passed an award dated 28th January, 1988 whereunder the award of the sole arbitrator was confirmed and the petitioner was directed

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top