SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 48

A.K.SIKRI
OM PRAKASH SARAF – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER, DIST. III-B (6), NEW DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.B.Andley, Sanjeev Sabharwal, SANJIV GOYAL


A. K. SIKRI, J.

( 1 ) SHRI P. K. Banerjee, Income-Tax Officer (ITO), has filed a complaint under sections 277/278 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') as well as under Sections 193/196 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, 'ipc') against as many as nine persons. Accused No. 1 is M/s. Radhey Sham Om prakash, which is a partnership firm (hereinafter referred to as 'the firm'), and accused Nos. 2 to 8 are the partners of accused No. 1. Accused No. 9 Shri r. K. Gupta is an Advocate who represented the firm. The gravamen of the charge is the false averment made by the accused persons to the effect that they had filed the income-tax return in respect of the assessment year 1981-82 on 6. 7. 1981, whereas no such return was allegedly filed and the return was filed only on 24. 3. 1983 in relation to the firm for the assessment year 1981-82. The factum of this alleged false statement surfaced in the following circumstances, as per the averments made in the complaint.

( 2 ) ON 24. 3. 1983, duly signed and verified income-tax return in respect of the firm was filed by the accused No. 5 Smt. Subhadhra Rajgaria showing taxable income at Rs. 2,14,900/ -. This return









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top