SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 96

MUKUL MUDGAL, ARUNA SURESH
H. K. DAS – Appellant
Versus
UOI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jyoti Singh, RACHNA GUPTA.


MUKUL MUDGAL, J.

( 1 ) IT is not in dispute that identical Writ Petition No. 4058 of 2002 and 5396 of 2002 raised the same issue of seniority between the Departmental promotees and Direct Recruits in the service of Armed Forces Head Quarter, Civil service staff officers. In fact this Court in the order dated 30. 09. 2005 had recorded the pleas of both the counsels that Ammini Rajan's decision is applicable to the facts of the present case.

( 2 ) BY the judgment dated 14th November, 2006 the Writ Petitions no. 4058/2002 and 5396/2002 were allowed by this Court and the CAT's order dated 1st April, 2002 in OA No. 1356/1997 in Ammini Rajan's case was set aside.

( 3 ) CONSEQUENTLY, since the Writ Petitions are admitted after hearing on the basis of similar relief, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that this Writ Petition also deserves to be allowed in terms of judgement dated 14th November, 2006 and other connected Writ Petitions.

( 4 ) MS. Jyoti Singh, appearing on behalf of Union of India also supports this plea. It is also submitted by the Petitioner that this court may while allowing the present Writ Petition, may fix the time for compliance of the judgement of th





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top