SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 93

SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
VOLTAS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
VOLTAS EMPLOYEES UNION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
UMESH SHARMA, VINAY SABHARWAL, Vinod Sabharwal


SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, J.

( 1 ) BY this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the validity of order dated 28. 10. 2001 passed by the Assistant Labour Commissioner ( in short 'the ALC) conferring status of protected workmen on S/shri. S. K. Sharma, rajender Prasad Tiwari, T. C. Jhangia and Jasbir Singh, all employees of the respondent for the year 2000-01 up to 11. 7. 2001, when the services of the aforementioned four persons were terminated by the management consequent to disciplinary action. Mr. Trilok Singh, another workman, was declared protected workman for complete year.

( 2 ) A perusal of the impugned order would show that Voltas Employees Union, ashok Vihar, Phase-I made an application under Section 33 (4) of Industrial dispute Act (in short ' the Act') to the ALC seeking declaration as protected workmen in respect of five of its office bearers named in the above paragraph for the year 2001-02. The union stated that it had made an application to the management for the same purpose on 15. 3. 2001 but the management did not consider the application and did not declare the above five office bearers of the union as protected workmen. Management in its reply took the stan


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top