SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 226

R.S.SODHI, P.K.BHASIN
CHET RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JAGDISH PRASAD, Ravinder Chadha, RAVINDER KUMAR


R. S. SODHI, J.

( 1 ) CRIMINAL Appeal 505 of 2002 seeks to challenge the judgment dated 08. 05. 2002 of the Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 187/1997, f. I. R. No. 153/96, registered at Police Station Ambedkar Nagar under Section 302/120b/201 IPC, whereby the learned Judge convicted accused Chet Ram under section 302/201 IPC. The other accused persons, namely, Bacha Ram and Ragho Ram were acquitted of all charges levelled against them. Vide separate order dated 15. 05. 2002, the learned Judge sentenced the convict, Chet Ram to undergo imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) under section 302 IPC and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for one year. The convict was also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- (rupees five thousand)under Section 201 IPC and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for six months. Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently. The benefit of Section 428 Cr. P. C. was also given to the convict.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts of the case as noted by the Additional Sessions judge are as follows:-

". . . . .










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top