S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.

( 1 ) THESE revision petitions impugn a summoning order of the learned magistrate, delhi, dated 11-5-2005, in so far as it did not include Sections 409, 420 IPC, and section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

( 2 ) THE brief facts are that the petitioner filed complaints under Section 409/420 ipc and Section 138 of Negotiable instrument Act. The petitioner is a manufacturer of leather goods, shoes and accessories having trade mark of "woodland". It appoints various distributors amongst it Mrs. Varsha Gandhi, sole proprietor of M/s. Parth Associates applied for distributorship; that facility was granted and M/s. Parth Associates, was appointed by the petitioner, as distributor on 18. 02. 98.

( 3 ) IT is alleged that the accused Ms. Varsha gandhi gave to the petitioner firm six cheques in April and May 1998, total amounting to Rs. 17,76,294. 32/- ; the cheques, on presentation to the Bank were dishonored on the ground of insufficient funds. It is further alleged that the said second respondent thereafter issued 18 cheques for Rs. 5 lakhs each, aggregating to Rs. 90 lakhs, in discharge of outstanding liabilities, i. e of Rs. 92,93,131. 32 with assurance tha