SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 289

MUKUL MUDGAL, ARUNA SURESH
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
KHAIRATI LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.K.Patel, KUMAR RAJESH SINGH


MUKUL MUDGAL, J.

( 1 ) RULE DB. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing.

( 2 ) THE Respondent Khairati Lal was working as APO as a Group 'b' officer and was deemed to be considered by a DPC for being placed in the senior scale on adhoc basis upon being found fit by such DPC. For the period from 1989 to 1993, the DPC held, did not find him fit for promotion to the senior scale. On 25. 03. 1991, the Respondent was issued a charge sheet for imposition of major penalty and another charge sheet dated 24. 10. 1997 for the imposition of minor penalty that resulted in the findings of the DPC regarding his promotion to the senior scale being kept in sealed cover. In both the enquiries the Respondent was found guilty and he was imposed minor penalty of stop Page of three sets of privileges passes in the major penalty charge sheet and three sets of privilege tickets in the minor penalty proceedings.

( 3 ) THE Respondent filed OA being No. 1704/1997 before the Central administrative Tribunal challenging the departmental enquiries and the punishment imposed upon him. The said OA was disposed of by the Tribunal vide its order da









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top