SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 357

A.K.SIKRI
SANDEEP CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Soni, Puneet Mittal, R.N.MITTAL, Ramesh Gupta


A. K. SIKRI, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONERS had business dealings with the respondents No. 2 to 4, who are the partners of M/s. Jain Art Jewels (hereinafter referred to as the complainants' ). According to the complainants, while dealing with them, the petitioners committed fraud and cheating. Accordingly, FIR No. 283/05 has been lodged with the Police Station Connaught Place, New Delhi under sections 420/406/467/468/471/120-B IPC. Though it is not necessary to go into the details of the allegations regarding the said fraud and cheating in this petition, suffice it to mention that the petitioners were working as commission agents for the complainants. They were obtaining orders from dubai for stainless steel utensils, which used to be executed by the complainants and the petitioners were getting commission thereon. As per the allegations, after gaining confidence of the complainants in this manner, both the petitioners, who are brothers, represented in January, 2004 that they had got a very huge order for which they needed advance payment from the complainants to be given to M/s. Prima Enterprises, Wazirpur Industrial area, Delh. Various cheques were thus issued in favour of M/s. Prime ente











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top