MUKUL MUDGAL, ARUNA SURESH
RAJESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
ARUNA SURESH, J.
( 1 ) RULE DB. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing.
( 2 ) THE petitioner has assailed the order dated 17. 11. 2003 of the central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the CAT) in O. A. No. 663/2003 whereby the OA of the petitioner was dismissed.
( 3 ) PETITIONER was appointed as Civilian Vehicle Mechanic (MV) in 505 Army Base Workshop on 21. 2. 2000 after qualifying selection. He was involved in a case FIR No. 348/1998 registered under Section 341/323/34 IPC, PS Najafgarh, delhi. At the time of filing of the Attestation Form for character and police verification, petitioner suppressed the fact of pending criminal case against him despite knowledge of the same. On verification the respondents were informed by the Dy. Commissioner of Police, Special Branch, Delhi that the petitioner was involved in case FIR No. 348 dated 8. 7. 1998 under Section 323/341/34 IPC, PS Najafgarh, Delhi pending adjudication. This resulted into issuance of show cause notice to the petitioner. After he replied to the same, he was charge-sheeted for departmental enquiry under Rule 14 of CCS (CCA)Rules,1965 for con
REFERRED TO : Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan Vs. Ramratan Yadav
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.