SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 218

MUKUL MUDGAL, ARUNA SURESH
RAJESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Trivedi, SURESH KAIT


ARUNA SURESH, J.

( 1 ) RULE DB. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing.

( 2 ) THE petitioner has assailed the order dated 17. 11. 2003 of the central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the CAT) in O. A. No. 663/2003 whereby the OA of the petitioner was dismissed.

( 3 ) PETITIONER was appointed as Civilian Vehicle Mechanic (MV) in 505 Army Base Workshop on 21. 2. 2000 after qualifying selection. He was involved in a case FIR No. 348/1998 registered under Section 341/323/34 IPC, PS Najafgarh, delhi. At the time of filing of the Attestation Form for character and police verification, petitioner suppressed the fact of pending criminal case against him despite knowledge of the same. On verification the respondents were informed by the Dy. Commissioner of Police, Special Branch, Delhi that the petitioner was involved in case FIR No. 348 dated 8. 7. 1998 under Section 323/341/34 IPC, PS Najafgarh, Delhi pending adjudication. This resulted into issuance of show cause notice to the petitioner. After he replied to the same, he was charge-sheeted for departmental enquiry under Rule 14 of CCS (CCA)Rules,1965 for con





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top