SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 484

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
TRISTAR CONSULTANTS – Appellant
Versus
CUSTOMER SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.SESHACHARY, M.S.Ganesh, NEELAM S.KUJUR, SUSHILA RAM, VIKAS DHAVAN

( 1 ) A short question arises for consideration in the present revision petition.

( 2 ) THE question is, under what circumstances and on what pleadings, a director of a company can be made liable in an action for recovery of damages alleging breach of contract by the company.

( 3 ) PETITIONER filed a suit stating that dinesh Mirchandani was carrying on business as the sole proprietor of the plaintiff. It was stated that the plaintiff is carrying on business of providing human resources facilitation by locating right candidates suitable for top level managerial positions. It was stated that defendant No. 1 represented through as also acting through Sanjay kumar, its director, (Defendant No. 2) held personal meetings as also exchanged proposals through e-mails. It was stated that defendant No. 2 negotiated and concluded a written contract. As per the said contract, plaintiff was to identify and recommend to defendant No. 1, after interviewing, suitable candidates. Plaintiff did so but defendants cancelled the contract. It was stated that post cancellation of the contract, correspondence was exchanged between the parties to recompense an agreed sum to the plaintiff. This corresponde

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top