SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 700

S.RAVINDRA BHAT
VARUNAKOCHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
NALIN TRIPATHI, S.K.TIWARI, V.K.Malik


S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner, named as accused in a First Information Report, invokes the inherent jurisdiction of this Court to quash criminal proceedings.

( 2 ) THE complainant Vandana Kochar, (respondent in the proceedings, hereafter "the wife") married Rakesh Kochar, the petitioner's brother (hereafter "the husband") on 3. 3. 1995, at NOIDA. A minor daughter was born out of the wedlock. The wife alleged that soon after marriage, her-in-laws started harassing her for jewellery and dowry, and, upon their provocation, the husband also threatened to divorce her. The husband and the Petitioner filed a suit for injunction seeking to restrain the complainant from entering the matrimonial home, in 1996. By that time, the complainant had gone to her parental house; the suit alleged that the complainant was intimidating the present petitioner and the husband. Upon a joint application moved by the petitioner, the husband and the complainant, the suit was compromised. The complainant Vandana Kochar recorded her consent and in terms of the compromise, the disputes were settled, by order of Court.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner the compromise recorded that the husband and















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top