S.RAVINDRA BHAT
VARUNAKOCHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.
( 1 ) THE petitioner, named as accused in a First Information Report, invokes the inherent jurisdiction of this Court to quash criminal proceedings.
( 2 ) THE complainant Vandana Kochar, (respondent in the proceedings, hereafter "the wife") married Rakesh Kochar, the petitioner's brother (hereafter "the husband") on 3. 3. 1995, at NOIDA. A minor daughter was born out of the wedlock. The wife alleged that soon after marriage, her-in-laws started harassing her for jewellery and dowry, and, upon their provocation, the husband also threatened to divorce her. The husband and the Petitioner filed a suit for injunction seeking to restrain the complainant from entering the matrimonial home, in 1996. By that time, the complainant had gone to her parental house; the suit alleged that the complainant was intimidating the present petitioner and the husband. Upon a joint application moved by the petitioner, the husband and the complainant, the suit was compromised. The complainant Vandana Kochar recorded her consent and in terms of the compromise, the disputes were settled, by order of Court.
( 3 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner the compromise recorded that the husband and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.