SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 666

SWATANTER KUMAR, H.R.MALHOTRA
COURT ON ITS MOTION – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJAY VERMA, J.R.Midha, RAJIV AVASTHI, ZUBEDA BEGUM SURESH KAIT


SWATANTER KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) CERTAIN submissions were made during the pronouncement of the judgment on behalf of various authorities and particularly the Government of NCT of Delhi and Union of India, praying for issuance of certain further directions to put the matter beyond ambiguity and to fix the responsibility of concerned departments.

( 2 ) WE are of the considered view that in order to ensure complete implementation of the directions and also not to pass orders, which would come in conflict with the orders passed by the other Courts, we also issue the following directions :-

(i) The competent authority shall notify proper speed limits for different routes. Till such notification is issued, the speed limit for roads inside delhi would be 45-50 kms per hour while in respect of the roads having 3-4 lane dual carriage, the speed would be 55 kms- 60 kms. per hour. This will be the speed limit for light motor vehicles, while for heavy motor vehicles, it would be 35-40 kms. per hours in Delhi city and for the roads having 3-4 lane dual carriage, the speed would be 45-50 kms. Once the notification is issued by the competent authority, after taking into consideration the recommendatio









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top