SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 832

REVA KHETRAPAL
PRIYA GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GIRJESH SINGH, Rajdipa Behura, RAKESH MUKHIJA, VIJAY AGARWAL


REVA KHETRAPAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed for a direction to the Police of police Station Sultanpuri, Delhi to add Sections 307/384/506/120-B/34 of IPC in the case registered by them at the behest of the petitioner, being case FIR no. 56/2007 under Sections 498a/406/34 IPC.

( 2 ) THE facts are in a narrow compass. The petitioner on 20th September, 2006 laid a detailed complaint before the Crime Against Women Cell, Pitampura, new Delhi alleging the commission of cognizable offences under Sections 498-A/406/307/384/506/120-B/34 I. P. C. The said complaint on 10th January, 2007 culminated in the registration of FIR No. 56/2007, under Sections 498a/406/34 of i. P. C, Police Station Sultanpuri, Delhi. Aggrieved by the registration of the said FIR only under the aforesaid sections, the present petition has been filed by the petitioner for addition of offences under Sections 307/384/506/120-B/34 i. P. C on the ground that the police cannot be allowed to tone down the offences alleged to have been committed by the accused persons in the complaint and to register a case for the commission of less grave offences at its own whims and fancies.

( 3 ) FOR the purpose of delvi






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top