SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 985

KAILASH GAMBHIR
POONAM MALHOTRA (TAMAR) – Appellant
Versus
ARYA MODEL SCHOOL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.P.MINOCHA, Sanjeev Ralli, Sujata Kashyap


KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.

( 1 ) RULE. With the consent of counsel appearing for the parties the matter is taken up for final hearing. The petitioner who got employment as a nursery teacher with respondent No. 1 school is aggrieved with the order dated 24. 03. 2004 passed by respondent No. 2, the Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi. The petitioner has sought quashing of the said order and has claimed reinstatement with full back wages and other perks/allowances etc. against respondent No. 1 school. The brief background of facts necessary for deciding the present writ petition inter-alia are that earlier the petitioner had filed a writ petition bearing CWP No. 7538/2003 on the same grounds and vide orders dated 18. 11. 2003 this Court in CWP No. 7558/2003 and CMP No. 12863/2003 gave the following directions:-

"counsel for the petitioner concedes that the offending acts of the respondents have not been brought to the notice of the Directorate of education who, under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 has ample powers to look into the grievances which have been raised in the writ petition. Counsel says that liberty be granted to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petitio












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top