SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1178

SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
STATE – Appellant
Versus
P. K. JAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MADHAV KHURANA, PRASHANT JAIN, RICHA KAPOOR, Sidharthra Luthra, Umesh Sinha

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been preferred by the State against the judgment dated 24. 10. 1983 whereby both the accused persons were acquitted by learned Special judge,delhi, of the charges under section 161/34 IPC, under section 5 (2) read with section 5 1 (i) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, read with section 34 of IPC.

( 2 ) THE facts relevant for the purpose of deciding this appeal are that one dev Raj Sahni (complainant) was Managing Director of the Company M/s Sahni Sons private Limited at 4/14a, Asaf Ali Road, New Delh. His two sons Rakesh Sahni and Rajesh Sahni were running business in the name of Sahni Sons Manufacturing company, at 3482, Netaji Subhash Marg, Delh. His sons were getting the cabins and wooden partition made in their office through a carpenter on 15. 6. 1980 when accused P. K. Jain, Junior Engineer of City Zone, MCD approached them in the office at about 2 p. m and told them that the wood work and partition being done in the office was contrary to law, since they had no permission. He was told by rakesh Sahni that no permission was required for getting old partition renovated. Mr. Jain told Mr. Rakesh Sahni to see him in his office on 16. 6. 80 with his fath




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top