SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1237

A.K.SIKRI
R. BASU – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL CAPTIAL TERRITORY OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajay Kapur, ANIL GOEL, DINESH MATHUR, M.N.DUDEJA, RAM JETHMALANI, SANDEEP MITTAL, SIDHARTH LUTHRA


A. K. SIKRI, J.

( 1 ) MR. Arun Aggarwal, a practising Advocate has filed a complaint before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, under Sections 293,293 and 294 IPC, inter-alia, against Star TV, Star Movies and V Channels as many as 30 (thirty) persons have been arraigned as accused persons in the said complaint. Other persons, apart from aforesaid Star TV channels, are the persons who are incharge of and responsible for the day to day affairs of these channels or the various cable" operators transmitting these channels. This is termed as probono public prosecution by the complainant in which he brought to the notice of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate that on these channels obscene and vulgar TV films were shown and transmitted through various cable operators. According to the complainant, this amounted to obscenity and, therefore, accused persons committed offence under Sections 292/293/294 IPC and under Section 6 read with Section 7 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986. On this complaint, learned CMM viewed these films. Thereafter, on 9. 4. 1997, he ordered police inquiry referring to the police the issue as to 'who are the persons respo























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top