SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1277

BADAR DURREZ AHMED
RAVINDER KUMAR SEHRAWAT @ R. K. SEHRAWAT – Appellant
Versus
CBI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Puneet Mittal, R.M.TIWARI, R.N.MITTAL, SHAHIDA BEGUM

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the order on charge dated 02. 09. 2005 and the charge framed on 14. 09. 2005. The petitioner has been charged of having committed offences under Sections 7, 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The petitioner has also been charged of the offences under Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 for having conspired with co-accused (Ram Singh Rawat ). In substance, the charge against the petitioner and the co-accused (Ram Singh Rawat) is that from 1997 till 11. 06. 2003, the petitioner while working as UDC in the office of the Deputy assessor and Collector, House Tax, MCD at Green Park allowed co-accused Ram singh Rawat, a private person, to illegally sit on his seat and conduct official work for him and that the co-accused (Ram Singh Rawat) had demanded and accepted rs. 5,000/- from the complainant (Shri Alok Gupta) on behalf of the petitioner on 11. 06. 2003 as illegal gratification for issuing a "no Objection Certificate" (NOC) to the complainant (Mr Alok Gupta) to reconstruct his house. Since it is alleged that the petitioner and the co-accused conspired in the act an











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top