SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1318

A.K.SIKRI
HANS CONSTRUCTION CO. – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJAY VERMA, ANURAG KUMAR

A. K. SIKRI, J.

( 1 ) THE DDA awarded contract for the work "construction of 96 Houses under SFS category III and Scooter Sheds Grade III at Paschim Puri, G-17, area South of distt. Centre, New Delh. Disputes arose between the parties. The petitioner invoked the arbitration clause. Arbitrator was appointed. Total claims of the petitioner were 14 and counter-claim was 1 before the learned Arbitrator for adjudication and award. The arbitrator has made and published the award bearing no. ARB/sck/20/109 dated 7. 6. 1994.

( 2 ) THE award was filed in this Court. Notice was issued to both the parties and both have filed the objections. DDA's objections are IA No. 4176/1995. The petitioner has filed objections by means of IA No. 7711/1995 which are qua claim no. 10 only. The perusal of the objections of DDA would indicate that these objections are broadly on the following premise:

(a) Non reasoned award; (b) irregularities; (c) arbitrator misconducted himself and proceedings; (d) award bad in law; (e) award without jurisdiction; (f) arbitrator gnored the material placed by the respondent/dda and; (g) Claims not substantiated. The aforesaid grounds are taken qua claim Nos. 1, 2, 3. 3, 5,




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top