PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
GYANTI – Appellant
Versus
SAMUNDER SINGH – Respondent
( 1 ) ON 22. 11. 2002, appellant No. 2 Chhaya Bharti sustained serious injuries in a vehicular accident. She is aggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded to her.
( 2 ) TOTAL compensation awarded to her is Rs. 1,65,455/ -. Break up is as under:- (a) Medicines, medical treatment, special diet and conveyance : Rs. 15,455/- (b) Pain and suffering : Rs. 50,000/- (c) Loss of enjoyment, amenity, and general damages : Rs. 1,00,000/-
( 3 ) SINCE injured Chhaya Bharti is in appeal and there are no cross objections, I need not deal with any other issue dealt with by the learned MACT, save and except, the quantum of damages awarded.
( 4 ) THE date of accident is 22. 11. 2002. Age of the appellant No. 2 as on the date of the accident was 7 years.
( 5 ) PERIOD during which the injured remained hospitalized was 4 months. e. from 22. 11. 2002 to 29. 3. 2003.
( 6 ) THE entire treatment was at Sushrut Trauma Centre, Delh. With regard to injuries suffered by the injured, it is relevant to note the testimony of Dr. V. K. Goel. In his testimony as PW-2, Dr. V. K. Goel, Dy. Medical superintendent, Sushrut Trauma Centre, Delhi has deposed as under:-
"as per the record th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.