SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1375

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
GYANTI – Appellant
Versus
SAMUNDER SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M.Singh, MANISHA TYAGI, NANITA SHARMA

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

( 1 ) ON 22. 11. 2002, appellant No. 2 Chhaya Bharti sustained serious injuries in a vehicular accident. She is aggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded to her.

( 2 ) TOTAL compensation awarded to her is Rs. 1,65,455/ -. Break up is as under:- (a) Medicines, medical treatment, special diet and conveyance : Rs. 15,455/- (b) Pain and suffering : Rs. 50,000/- (c) Loss of enjoyment, amenity, and general damages : Rs. 1,00,000/-

( 3 ) SINCE injured Chhaya Bharti is in appeal and there are no cross objections, I need not deal with any other issue dealt with by the learned MACT, save and except, the quantum of damages awarded.

( 4 ) THE date of accident is 22. 11. 2002. Age of the appellant No. 2 as on the date of the accident was 7 years.

( 5 ) PERIOD during which the injured remained hospitalized was 4 months. e. from 22. 11. 2002 to 29. 3. 2003.

( 6 ) THE entire treatment was at Sushrut Trauma Centre, Delh. With regard to injuries suffered by the injured, it is relevant to note the testimony of Dr. V. K. Goel. In his testimony as PW-2, Dr. V. K. Goel, Dy. Medical superintendent, Sushrut Trauma Centre, Delhi has deposed as under:-

"as per the record th


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top