VIPIN SANGHI
CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA – Appellant
Versus
B. MAHAJAN – Respondent
( 1 ) BY this order I propose to dispose off IA No. 525/2007 under order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC filed by the plaintiff and IA No. 1632/2007 under order 39 Rule 4 CPC filed by the defendant. Counsel for both the parties have addressed their arguments and have relied upon the record and various judicial pronouncements.
( 2 ) THE plaintiff, Canon Inc. , is a Japanese company manufacturing professional and consumer Imaging Equipment and Information Systems. The plaintiff company has filed the instant suit for seeking the relief of a perpetual injunction restraining infringement of trademark Canon and infringement of their copyright in the stylised manner in which the said mark is used, and for passing of, delivery up and rendition of accounts. Plaintiff's contentions:
( 3 ) THE plaintiff company, under the trademark Canon, started its operations around 70 years ago and has, over the years, earned itself the reputation of manufacturing and selling cameras and multimedia machines which are a benchmark in the industry. Plaintiff company has offices in almost all major countries of the world and manufacturing units in America, Germany, france, Taiwan, Korea, Malaysia, Thai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.