SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1371

VIPIN SANGHI
CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA – Appellant
Versus
B. MAHAJAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIHU SHARMA, Gaurav Miglani, M.K.MIGLANI

VIPIN SANGHI, J.

( 1 ) BY this order I propose to dispose off IA No. 525/2007 under order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC filed by the plaintiff and IA No. 1632/2007 under order 39 Rule 4 CPC filed by the defendant. Counsel for both the parties have addressed their arguments and have relied upon the record and various judicial pronouncements.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff, Canon Inc. , is a Japanese company manufacturing professional and consumer Imaging Equipment and Information Systems. The plaintiff company has filed the instant suit for seeking the relief of a perpetual injunction restraining infringement of trademark Canon and infringement of their copyright in the stylised manner in which the said mark is used, and for passing of, delivery up and rendition of accounts. Plaintiff's contentions:

( 3 ) THE plaintiff company, under the trademark Canon, started its operations around 70 years ago and has, over the years, earned itself the reputation of manufacturing and selling cameras and multimedia machines which are a benchmark in the industry. Plaintiff company has offices in almost all major countries of the world and manufacturing units in America, Germany, france, Taiwan, Korea, Malaysia, Thai












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top