SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1409

SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
RAJ ELECTRICALS (REGD. ) – Appellant
Versus
BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.LAL, GUNITIA PAHWA, MANOJ K.SINGH, MANSOOR ALI, Rahul Dhawan, Vijay K.Singh

( 1 ) THIS application has been made under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act by the petitioner/applicant for granting an interim injunction against the respondent restraining respondent from disconnecting supply of electricity to the petitioner or from taking direct control of distribution of electricity and directing the respondent to maintain status quo in respect of the agreement entered into between parties till the decision of the dispute by the arbitrator.

( 2 ) THE brief facts relevant for the purpose of deciding this application are that Delhi Vidyut Board (DVB), the earlier body responsible for supply and distribution of electricity in the city, had entered into an agreement with the petitioner under a scheme whereunder the unauthorized colonies were provided electricity through contractors. DVB was supplying electricity to the petitioner at single point and the petitioner contractor was supplying electricity to the cluster of houses in unauthorized colony. The petitioner contractor was called Single Point Delivery Contractor. The agreement was entered into for a period of seven years and could be renewed for further period by mutual consent. The agreement was













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top