SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1430

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
PANDIT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bhupesh Narula, H.L.NARULA, Nidhi Jain, RAMAN KAPUR

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is a registered partnership firm and in pursuance to an invitation for tender floated by respondent no. 1 for work of construction of shopping centre at New Rajinder Nagar, a tender bid was submitted. The tender submitted by the petitioner was accepted in terms of the letter dated 30. 11. 1990 of respondent no. 1/dda at a tendered cost of Rs. 1,24,75,860/- and an agreement was executed between the parties dated 12. 12. 1990. The stipulated date of completion was 9. 3. 1992 (15 months ). The work was, however, completed only in late April, 1998 and the completion certificate was issued on 28. 4. 1998. The petitioner blames respondent no. 1/dda for the same.

( 2 ) IT is the case of the petitioner that in view of the disputes about payment between the petitioner and respondent no. 1, the petitioner issued a notice dated 9. 7. 2001 to the Chief Engineer of respondent no. 1 for appointment of an arbitrator and in view of the failure to do so, filed a Suit No. AA No. 258/2002 before this Court. Shri C. S. Jawa, District and Sessions Judge (retd.) was appointed as the sole arbitrator in terms of the order dated 27. 8. 2003 passed in the said s
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top