SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1469

A.K.SIKRI, ARUNA SURESH
NARESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
ASHOK ARORA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.Tarun

A. K. SIKRI, J.

( 1 ) THE respondent herein had filed suit for possession and mesne profits. The relief clause contains certain other prayers as well, which includes decree of permanent injunction seeking restraint against the defendants (appellants herein) from transferring, selling, alienating or otherwise parting with possession of the premises,. e. Shop No. 3, Pocket D-12, Property No. 231/1, sector-7, Rohini, New Delhi and not to interfere, in any manner, with peaceful possession of the plaintiff in the premises shown red in the site plan annexed. With the consent of the parties, the matter was referred to mediation. Before the mediation the parties settled the matter and the terms on which the matter was settled were recorded in the proceedings dated 26. 7. 2006 by the judge/mediator Shri Dharmesh Sharma. In this, following terms were agreed:-

"1. It is agreed that defendant No. 1 shall pay total sum of Rs. 5 Lacs to the plaintiff on or before 10th of November, 2006 by way of Pay Order or Bank draft; and 2. It is agreed by the Plaintiff that on payment of the said sum to him on or before 10th of November, 2006, he shall withdraw his complaint against defendant No. 1 u/s 138















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top