( 1 ) VIDE impugned order dated 5. 3. 2007 an application filed by the defendant under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking impleadment of Delhi State Industrial Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as DSIDC) has been allowed.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF is aggrieved by the said order. Hence, the instant petition invoking remedy under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

( 3 ) SHORN of unnecessary details, relevant for the purposes of adjudication of the matter in issue within the confines of Order 1 Rule 10 cpc, relevant facts are that the plaintiff filed a suit for ejectment, mesne profits/damages alleging that she had inducted the defendant as a licensee to use a portion of Shed No. 22, DSIDC Complex, Okhla Phase II, Scheme ii, New Delhi. That the license was for a period of 3 years effective from 1. 9. 1990. That the license fee was Rs. 19,000/- per month. That terms of license were to be found in a written deed dated 27. 8. 1990. That contrary to the terms of license, the defendant has trespassed into unlicensed areas within the shed.

( 4 ) IN the written statement filed, the license agreement has not been denied. It is stated t