SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1642

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
SUSHILA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ATUL SHARMA, VIJAY SHARMA

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

( 1 ) SECURITIES and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) filed a complaint against the petitioners under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with section 24 (1) and 27 of the Securities and exchange Board of India, 1992. Inter alia, it was stated that Section 11 of the Act casts upon SEBI the duty to protect the interest of investors in securities and that SEBI was enjoined upon to promote the development of and to regulate the securities market through appropriate measures.

( 2 ) IT was stated that the last decade had witnessed initiative by private entrepreneurs to undergo plantation activities on a commercial scale. It was noted that promoters would invest minimal amounts in such ventures. They would raise funds from ordinary investors in the absence of regulatory mechanisms. It was stated that the high returns promised under the schemes were questionable. It was stated that in the year 1997 certain guidelines were framed pertaining to plantation companies.

( 3 ) LISTING out various regulations which require to be complied with in the year 1997 and alleging that the same were not complied with, complaint was filed alleging violation of Se





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top