( 1 ) FIR No. 6/2007 dated 3. 1. 2007 under Section 498-A/406 IPC ps Hazrat Nizamuddin. Vide Bail Application No. 1711/2007, smt. Surjit Kaur Chopra seeks anticipatory bail. Vide Bail Application No. 1716/2007, sh. Harbhajan Singh Chopra seeks anticipatory bail. The 2 applicants are the mother-in-law and father-in-law respectively of the complainant, Arti.

( 2 ) AT the outset, I must refer my displeasure at the manner in which Bail application No. 1711/2007 has been drafted by learned counsel for the petitioner.

( 3 ) THE same is a verbatim copy of Bail application No. 1716/2007.

( 4 ) USE of computers does not mean that learned members of the Bar would not apply their mind. Human beings cannot become computers and start operating themselves by clicking a mouse.

( 5 ) LITTLE realizing that in Bail Application no. 1716/2007 reference to the applicant was made as father of the husband of the complainant i. e. as father-in-law of the complainant, even Smt. Surjit Kaur Chopra has been referred to as father of the husband of the complainant i. e. father-in-law of the complainant.

( 6 ) IN the instant case, the misdescription may be trivial. But in large numbe