( 1 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners states that inadvertently Karuna bhatia, Business Manager was not impleaded as petitioner No. 2 inasmuch as counsel for the petitioners thought that as Karuna Bhatia had filed the petition on behalf of Standard Chartered Bank, the petition would enure to the benefit of Karuna Bhatia as well.

( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners concedes that the belief of learned counsel for the petitioners is in sweet ignorance of law.

( 3 ) SUFFICE would it be to state that where a company and the living human being stated to be in charge and control of the affairs of the company are impleaded as accused persons, each is an accused in its/his individual capacity and each must take recourse to legal remedy available as per law.

( 4 ) BE that as it may, amended memo of parties is taken on record. Ms. Karuna Bhatia is impleaded as petitioner No. 2.

( 5 ) PETITIONERS are aggrieved by the fact that they have been summoned to face trial in a complaint filed by respondent No. 2 under Section 138 of the negotiable Instruments Act 1881.

( 6 ) FIRST petitioner is Standard Chartered Bank. Second petitioner is ms. Karuna Bhatia, Manag