SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1655

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
ANIL KUMAR GUPTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K.AGRAWAL, H.L.TIKKU, K.K.JAIN, SURYAKANT SINGLA, Yashmeet Kaur

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent injunction against the original defendants in respect of the property bearing No. 1, Tughlak Lane, New Delh. The plaint was subsequently amended and suffice to say at this stage that defendants no. 7 and 8, now impleaded in the suit, are not members of the family while the plaintiff and the other defendants are members of the same family.

( 2 ) LATE Shri L. Hanuman Pershad Gupta was Karta of a HUF styled as M/s Deoki nandan and Sons and one of the assets acquired by the said HUF was the property in suit in pursuance to a perpetual lease deed dated 13. 10. 1937. On the said plot a construction was raised and the family members occupied the property.

( 3 ) THE HUF is stated to have disrupted in the year 1957 which had a consequent impact on the suit property. Late Shri L. Hanuman Pershad Gupta passed away on 8. 12. 1972 leaving behind a Will by which his estate was bequeathed to his four sons in equal shares. The property in suit in pursuance to a memorandum of mutation dated 31. 3. 1975 was consequently mutated.

( 4 ) WITH the passing away of late Shri L. Hanuman Pershad Gupta and the family members being
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top