SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1721

MUKUL MUDGAL, REVA KHETRAPAL
REVA KHETRAPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


MUKUL MUDGAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS order is a sequel to the orders passed 23rd November, 2006 by this Court in the following terms:

"after arguments were concluded, learned counsel for the appellant stated that he has instructions from the appellant to the effect that the appellant is ready to give his entire movable and immovable property to his three children so that they can be looked after. "

( 2 ) THEREAFTER the appeal filed by the appellant in this Court was dismissed and his conviction for the murder of his wife Meenakshi under Section 302 IPC was upheld and the appellant's sentence for life awarded by the learned sessions Judge on 27th March 2002 was confirmed. Subsequent thereto, on 16th january 2007, the following order was passed:

"we have heard the convict and also perused the report given by Mr. Dharmesh Sharma, Secretary, Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee. The present situation is that Ms. Renu is living with her maternal grandfather while surender and Amar Sharma are living in 'arya Orphanage', Pataudi House, daryaganj. We have enquired from Surender and Amar Sharma regarding their well being. They appear to be reasonably satisfied with the arrangements at the orpha




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top