SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1795

S.RAVINDRA BHAT
SUSHILA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.D.GOEL, M.M.KALRA, MADHU TEVATIA, Sanjiv God

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.

( 1 ) THE writ Petitioner is aggrieved by the termination of a LPG (Liquified Petroleum Gas) dealership by the respondent, Indian Oil corporation (hereafter called "ioc" ).

( 2 ) THE facts necessary to decide this case are that the petitioner's husband was a Major-General in the Army. On 7. 11. 1988, the said Maj. Gen. B. N. Kumar died during engagement with extremists in Punjab. As a gesture of rehabilitation for his family, the IOC decided to grant an LPG outlet to his widow, the present Petitioner. After a wait of over 5 years, the distributorship Agreement was executed by the parties on 7. 7. 1994. The petitioner commenced business.

( 3 ) IT is averred that the Petitioner operated the distributorship with outlet or hinderance for the eight year period between 1994 and 2001. On 21. 4. 2001, the IOC issued a show cause notice to her, levelling allegations, including, inter alia, that she had stopped carrying on business. The petitioner replied on 2. 5. 2001, denying that there was any breach of the agreement or that she was unavailable at the outlet; she stated that the business was managed under her close supervision. On 5-6-2001, the IOC closed the matte















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top