SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1825

V.B.GUPTA
ANITA DIWAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE GOVT. (NCT) OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.S.Chaudhary, O.P.SAXENA

V. B. GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) PRESENT petition has been filed under section 482 Cr. P. C. by the petitioner who is the complainant, for setting aside the impugned order dated 2nd March, 2007 passed by Sh. Rajiv Mehra, Addl. Sessions judge, Delhi.

( 2 ) PETITIONER had lodged the above mentioned F. I. R. against the accused persons and the case is pending before metropolitan Magistrate for evidence.

( 3 ) ON 1st February, 2007, an application under Section 320 (2) Cr. P. C. for seeking permission to compound the case was moved by the petitioner. Vide order dated 2nd February, 2007 the learned trial court rejected the application. Thereafter, petitioner filed revision before the court of sessions and vide the impugned order the revision petition was also dismissed.

( 4 ) IT is contended that the impugned order is unjustified and erroneous as the petitioner herself appeared before the court and showed her willingness to bury all the disputes and controversy against the accused persons and the learned trial court did not peruse the application of the petitioner supported by the affidavit which reflected that she is compromising without any force or pressure.

( 5 ) IN support of his content

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top