SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1828

S.RAVINDRA BHAT
SAHIBABAD IMPEX PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
UOI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ankur Chhibber, ASHWANI KUMAR DHATWALIA, Jyoti Singh, PARVEEN RAVAL

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.

( 1 ) IN these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner questions concurrent orders of the Apparel Export Promotion Council; the Appellate Textile Commissioner and the Second Appellate Committee constituted to decide grievances, by the Central Government, Ministry of textiles.

( 2 ) THE Petitioner was allocated a quota in terms of the Garment Export policy prevalent in 1997, under provisions of the Foreign Trade (Development and regulation) Act, 1992 (hereafter, "the Regulations" ). At that time, garment exports were entitled to benefits/schemes such as Past Performance Entitlement (PPE); Past Performance Transfer (PPT); First Come First Served (FCFS); Non-Quota Entitlement (NQE) NQT and NIE (New Investment Entitlement) etc. These enabled exporters to a slew of concessions/ quota. In terms of these schemes if an exporter completed his obligations before 30th of September of the concerned calendar year, he was unconditionally, eligible, to benefits without submission of legal undertakings or bank guarantees. However, if quantities were left over and were sought to be exported on or after October, till December of the year, extension was

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top