SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1927

High Court Of Delhi
Pradeep Nandrajog
BHARAT NIDHI LTD. - Appellant
Versus
REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES - Respondents
Crl. M. (M) 1981 Of 2003
Decided On : 09/12/2007

Advocates Appeared:
Krishender Dutta, SURESH KAIT

The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Section 205-A of the Companies Act, 1956 and the effect of the 1988 amendment on the transfer of unpaid dividend to the special account.

Headnote:

Companies Act - Section 205-A - Interpretation of Section 205-A regarding transfer of unpaid dividend to special account

Fact of the Case:

The complaint was filed under Section 205-A (8) of the Companies Act 1956 for not transferring the amount of dividend to Special Dividend Account. The court found that the requirement of law pertaining to the transfer of the amount of dividend to Unpaid Dividend Account was as stipulated in sub-section (1) of Section 205-A of the Companies Act 1956.

Finding of the Court:

The court analyzed the legal provisions and concluded that the amendment to Section 205-A in 1988 addressed the lacuna of warrants not encashed and clarified the requirement for transfer to the Unpaid Dividend Account.

Issues: Interpretation of Section 205-A of the Companies Act, 1956 and the effect of the 1988 amendment on the transfer of unpaid dividend to the special account.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in H. P. Gupta vs. Hiralal, which established that dividend is paid when a cheque or warrant is sent through post to the shareholder entitled to payment. The court also emphasized the impact of the 1988 amendment on the transfer of unpaid dividend.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the impugned complaint and the order summoning the petitioner to face trial were quashed with no costs.

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

( 1 ) A short point arises for consideration. Whether on the allegations made in the complaint an actionable cause has been disclosed?

( 2 ) COMPLAINT has been filed under Section 205-A (8) of the Companies act 1956 as it existed in the year 1988, the year in which the complaint was filed.

( 3 ) GRAVEMENT of the allegation is as averred in para 3 of the complaint. The same reads as under:-

"3. Though the default of the Provisions of Section 205-A came to the notice during the course of inspection under Section 209-A by an officer of the Company Law Board, Department of Company Affairs. It was observed during the course of inspection that the company had declared dividend but did not transfer the amount of dividend to Special Dividend Account in respect of those dividends/warrants which had been posted within the stipulated time i. e. 42 days but had not been encashed due to some reason or the other. Thus by not transferring the amount pertaining to such dividends/warrants to a special account the company has committed default of the aforesaid provisions of the act. A show cause notice for this non-compliance was issued to the company on 7. 7. 84 (Annexed ). "

( 4 ) IT is apparent, a fact not disputed by learned counsel for the respondent, that the case of the prosecution against the accused persons is of not transferring the amount of dividend to Special Dividend Account.

( 5 ) AT the relevant point of time requirement of law pertaining to transfer of amount of dividend to Unpaid Dividend Account was as stipulated in sub-section (1) of Section 205-A of the Companies Act 1956. The same read as under:-

"205-A (1) Where, after the commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1974, a dividend has been declared by a company but has not been paid, or the warrant in respect thereof has not been posted, within forty-two days from the date of the declaration to any shareholder entitled to the payment of the dividend, the company shall, within seven days from the date of expiry of the said period of forty-two days, transfer the total amount of dividend which remains unpaid or in relation to which no dividend warrant has been posted within the said period of forty-two days, to a special account to be opened by the company in that behalf in any scheduled bank to be called 'unpaid Dividend Account of. . . . . . . . . Company limited/company (Private) Limited'. "

( 6 ) IT would be relevant to note that with effect from 15. 6. 1998 by the Companies (Amendment) Act 1988 legal provision was amended to read as under:-

"205a. (1) Where, after the commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1974, a dividend has been declared by a company but has not been paid, or claimed, within forty-two days from the date of the declaration, to any shareholder entitled to the payment of the dividend, the company shall, within seven days from the date of expiry of the said period of forty-two days, transfer the total amount of dividend which remains unpaid [or unclaimed] within the said period of forty-two days, to a special account to be opened by the company in that behalf in any scheduled bank, to be called 'unpaid Dividend account of. . . . . . . . . . . . Company Limited/company (Private) Limited'. "

( 7 ) THE issue pertaining to interpretation of Section 205-A of the companies Act is no longer res integra.

( 8 ) DECISION of the Supreme Court reported as 1970 (1) SCC 437 h. P. Gupta vs. Hiralal has concluded the issue. It has been held that dividend is paid either when it is paid in cash or when a cheque or a warrant is sent through post at the registered address of the shareholder who is entitled to payment thereof.

( 9 ) PERUSAL of Section 205-A (1) of the Companies Act as it existed prior to the amendment on 15. 6. 1988 reveals that warrant in respect of a dividend has to be posted to the shareholder within 42 days from the date of declaration of dividend.

( 10 ) THE requirement of transfer of the Unpaid Dividend Account was






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top