SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1982

High Court Of Delhi
SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
PURUSHOTTAM @ BALLO - Appellant
Versus
STATE ( N. C. T. OF DELHI) - Respondents
CRL. APPEAL 891 Of 2006
Decided On : 09/17/2007

Advocates Appeared:
AMAN LEKHI, AMIT SHARMA, MANOJ OHRI, SHYAMAL KUMAR

The court has the discretion to suspend a sentence and grant bail under Section 389 Cr. P. C based on the circumstances of the case and the evidence presented.

Headnote:

Suspension of Sentence - Section 389 Cr. P. C - The court suspended the sentence of the appellant convicted under Sections 304/307 IPC and granted bail based on the appellant's lack of direct involvement in inflicting injuries on the deceased.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was convicted under Sections 304/307 IPC but had not inflicted any injuries on the deceased, though he was present and involved in the quarrel.

Finding of the Court:

The court considered the evidence and judgment, and deemed it a fit case to suspend the appellant's sentence and grant bail.

Issues: Suspension of sentence and grant of bail under Section 389 Cr. P. C

Ratio Decidendi: The appellant's lack of direct involvement in inflicting injuries on the deceased influenced the court's decision to suspend the sentence and grant bail.

Final Decision: The sentence of the appellant is suspended, and he is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and surety.

( 1 ) THIS application is for suspension of sentence and grant of bail under section 389 Cr. P. C moved on behalf of the appellant Purushotam who has been convicted by the learned trial court under Sections 304/307 IPC.

( 2 ) A perusal of the judgment and the testimony of witnesses would show that the appellant had not inflicted any injuries on the person of deceased, though he was present and was involved in the quarrel.

( 3 ) CONSIDERING the entire evidence and the judgment of the learned trial court, I consider it a fit case where the sentence of the appellant should be suspended. The sentence of the appellant is hereby suspended and he is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/-with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court concerned. The application stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top