High Court Of Delhi
SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
PURUSHOTTAM @ BALLO - Appellant
Versus
STATE ( N. C. T. OF DELHI) - Respondents
CRL. APPEAL 891 Of 2006
Decided On : 09/17/2007
Suspension of Sentence - Section 389 Cr. P. C - The court suspended the sentence of the appellant convicted under Sections 304/307 IPC and granted bail based on the appellant's lack of direct involvement in inflicting injuries on the deceased.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was convicted under Sections 304/307 IPC but had not inflicted any injuries on the deceased, though he was present and involved in the quarrel.
Finding of the Court:
The court considered the evidence and judgment, and deemed it a fit case to suspend the appellant's sentence and grant bail.
Issues: Suspension of sentence and grant of bail under Section 389 Cr. P. C
Ratio Decidendi: The appellant's lack of direct involvement in inflicting injuries on the deceased influenced the court's decision to suspend the sentence and grant bail.
Final Decision: The sentence of the appellant is suspended, and he is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and surety.
( 2 ) A perusal of the judgment and the testimony of witnesses would show that the appellant had not inflicted any injuries on the person of deceased, though he was present and was involved in the quarrel.
( 3 ) CONSIDERING the entire evidence and the judgment of the learned trial court, I consider it a fit case where the sentence of the appellant should be suspended. The sentence of the appellant is hereby suspended and he is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/-with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court concerned. The application stands disposed of.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.