SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1992

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
AMAR PAL SINGH CHADHA @ SONU – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ATUL SHARMA, Jaideep Malik, Manu Sishodia

( 1 ) PETITIONER Amar Pal Singh Chadha is the husband of the complainant Manjit Kaur.

( 2 ) HE seeks pre-arrest bail in aforenoted FIR.

( 3 ) IT is an admitted case of the parties that petitioner and the complainant solemnize their marriage on 23. 4. 2000 at Haldwani and resided as husband and wife at Haldwani. It is also an admitted fact that the parties never resided in Delhi.

( 4 ) GRAVEMENT of the allegations against the petitioner and his family members as contained in the FIR are that soon after the marriage dowry demand commenced. That notwithstanding that father of the complainant spent 20 lacs at the time of the marriage, petitioner and his family members demanded more and more. That the complainant was physically assaulted by not only the petitioner but even his paternal uncle and his paternal aunt. That in March 2001 complainant had to leave her matrimonial house. That in April 2001, due to intervention of family elders there was a reconciliation. That complainant went back to her matrimonial house but had to leave in August 2001 because of continued harassment. That in May 2003 complainant went to Haldwani to attend the marriage of her cousin. At that point of time,
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top